top of page

Dual occ Vs Non Dual Occ investment returns

  • Writer: Swarup Dutta
    Swarup Dutta
  • Jul 27, 2015
  • 2 min read

Dual occupancy is cash positive compared to a non dual occ investment

This is an extract from a Certified Practicing Accountant- David Shaw.

It shows the cash positive opportunities a dual offers for a retiree or a first home investor.

One of the most significant and positive development I have seen during my 4000 interviews over the past 10 years is the dual occupancy property. The dual occupancy is simply a property with two sources of income. Some Local Councils will allow a 3 bedroom and a 2 or 1 bedroom apartment to be constructed on the one property. Returns for both the short and long term are superior and this assists tax payers with the recurring question of “how can I make my property positively geared?” Dual occupancy gives superior cash flow because of the two sources of income. Upon analysis of this, I discovered the following:

Cashflow:

  • A typical dual occupancy property purchased at $550,000 can almost be positively geared from Day 1. That is, with a purchase price of $550,000 the combined rental can be $670 per week as opposed to a non-dual occupancy property at the same price at $550 per week. This additional $120 per week means that after 20 years of holding the property even if the property pays off no debt it will still yield twice the cash flow return.

Levels of debt

Because the dual occupancy delivers a superior cash flow you actually need less of these properties in retirement to achieve the same result. In the example used above, if you were to purchase 3 of these properties today with a 5% rental growth over the next 20 years without paying off any debt, you would generate a positive cash flow of $114,081 per annum. If a $550,000 non-dual occupancy property was purchased with the same rental growth you would need 6 of these properties to develop the same cash flow. Therefore, with a dual occupancy property you take on half the debt and achieve the same long term cash flow.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Swarup Dutta is the owner of this domain name and rebranded the website to give it a personal touch.

* Swarup, our Founder, while consulting to a Property Subdivision firm, developers and architects managed 250+ property subdivision permits.

Disclaimer & Terms of Engagement

The information provided on this website and within our "Site Verdict" or "Advanced Feasibility" reports is intended as Professional Planning Opinion based on the Victorian Planning Provisions (VPP) and our experience with over 250+ managed approvals.

Please note the following:

  • Preliminary Nature: All yield projections, building envelopes, and feasibility data are preliminary. They are subject to formal site surveys, soil reports, and final architectural drafting.

  • Statutory Authority: While we leverage deep expertise to mitigate risk, the final decision regarding any Planning Permit rests solely with the relevant Local Government Authority (Council) or VCAT.

  • 2026 Costings: Construction estimates and trade rates are based on current 2026 Victorian market benchmarks and are subject to fluctuation based on site-specific complexities and final builder tenders.

  • Professional Advice: This guidance does not constitute legal or financial advice. We recommend all clients consult with a qualified legal practitioner regarding Title Covenants and a financial advisor regarding project funding and tax implications.

AuArchitecture reserves the right to refine project strategies as detailed site data becomes available.

We advise you must seek legal and financial advice prior to making a commitment on any property development venture. The opinions we provide are general in nature.

© Copyright
bottom of page